Forum Home  >  Forums  >  Reviews and Critiques  >  Thread

Sherlock Holmes > Avatar


 
     

Re: Sherlock Holmes > Avatar

by Calix Lewis Reneau on Tue Dec 29, 2009 3:39am

It looks like the BO sez that Dances with Smurfs > Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Cerebral Hemispheres.

Cheers,
Calix

(...remember, I predicted Avatar to do between $300M - $400M… I’ll be surprised if it tops $400M, but it might - when was the last time a wide-release film only saw a 3% decline on the second weekend?!)

Posted: Sun., Dec. 27, 2009, 8:27am PT
Holiday box office breaks records
‘Avatar’ tops ‘Chipmunks,’ ‘Sherlock Holmes’ with $75 million
By PAMELA MCCLINTOCK

There was enough Christmas cheer for nearly everyone at the domestic B.O., which tallied its biggest weekend in history as a number of films—led by 20th Century’s 3D juggernaut “Avatar”—benefited from moviegoers stuffing themselves silly.

Revenues for the frame reached an estimated $280 million, overtaking the $260 million earned the weekend “The Dark Knight” opened in July 2008.

In another milestone, domestic ticket sales for 2009 jumped the $10 billion mark for the first time ever, capping a record-breaking year that is running 12% ahead of last year. Attendance is up more than 5%.

“Avatar” dipped only 3% in its second sesh to an estimated $75 million from 3,456 runs for a cume of $212.3 million. Overseas, the James Cameron-directed pic fell 12% to an estimated $145 million from 14,844 playdates in 108 markets for a foreign total of $405 million and dazzling worldwide haul of $617.3 million in its first 10 days.

Placing No. 2 domestically was Warner Bros.’ Robert Downey Jr.-Jude Law topliner “Sherlock Holmes,” opening to $65.4 million from 3,626 to easily secure the top bow ever for a Christmas weekend. Previous record-holder was “Meet the Fockers” ($46.2 million).

Fox is ending the year on a high note, between “Avatar” and “Alvin and the Chipmunks: The Squeakquel,” which posted a five-day Christmas bow of $77.1 million from 3,700 runs. That included a weekend haul of $50.2 million, which put the kiddie pic at No. 3 and bested the $44.2 million debut of the first “Alvin” the weekend of Dec. 14, 2007.

Overseas, “Squeakquel” debuted to a strong $36.5 million from 5,492 screens in 42 markets for a worldwide debut of $113.6 million. International number was 215% ahead of “Alvin’s” opening in the same territories.

Stateside, Universal’s female-skewing romantic comedy “It’s Complicated” came in No. 4, grossing an estimated $22.1 million from 2,886 to score Nancy Meyers her second-best bow after that of “What Women Want” ($33.6 million). “It’s Complicated” stars Meryl Streep, Alec Baldwin and Steve Martin.

Expanding wide over the frame were Paramount’s George Clooney starrer “Up in the Air” and the Weinstein Co.‘s Rob Marshall-directed musical “Nine.”

“Up in the Air” came in No. 5 for the weekend, grossing an estimated $11.8 million from 1,895 theaters for a cume of $24.5 million and location average of 6,203.

“Nine” placed No. 8, grossing a softer $5.5 million from 1,412 screens for a cume of $5.9 million and per-location average of 3,926.

Distributors said the box office gained with Dec. 25 falling on a Friday as Christmas afternoon and evening are a busy time for theaters, and Friday is a big moviegoing day to begin with.

Most films saw substantial gains from Friday to Saturday, particularly family pics. “Alvin” was up 41%; “Avatar,” 21%; “Up in the Air,” 19%; and “It’s Complicated,” 16%.

The only two movies on the top 10 chart seeing Friday-to-Saturday declines were “Sherlock” (-11%) and “Nine” (-8%).

It is routine for films doing business on opening day to see a Saturday drop, however, as in the case of “Sherlock,” which grossed a record-breaking $24.9 million on Christmas Day. That put “Sherlock” ahead of “Avatar’s” $23.5 million to win the day. Previous best Christmas Day gross for a new pic was that of “Marley and Me” ($14.4 million).

“I’m thrilled that we blew away all the expectations,” Warner Bros. prexy of domestic distribution Dan Fellman said.

“Sherlock” skewed slightly male at 54%. Audience was fairly evenly divided among auds over and under 30. Warners is hoping the pic, which received a B CinemaScore, will launch a franchise.

As of three weeks ago, many box office observers believed “Sherlock” had a shot at beating “Avatar” over Christmas weekend. Based on an iconic character, “Sherlock,” directed by Guy Ritchie and also starring Rachel McAdams, was a known brand.

Despite the challenge of introducing tentpoles based on original stories, “Avatar” is benefiting from incredible word of mouth, as evidenced by the fact that the film nearly grossed as much in its second frame as in its first $77 million frame.

Fox senior VP of distribution Bert Livingston said it wasn’t a surprise that “Sherlock” beat “Avatar” on Christmas Day but that “Avatar” ruled overall. “It was our second Friday, and I think they had a great campaign. People wanted to see (‘Sherlock’),” Livingston said.

Livingston added that the studio couldn’t have been more delighted with the opening of “Squeakquel.”

“When Alvin did $18.8 million on the first day, I thought that every family had gone to see it opening day, and wondered whether it would be the biggest day of the weekend. I didn’t think we could beat that number, but we did, and the film grossed $20.4 million on Saturday,” Livingston said.

“Squeakquel’s” audience was 70% families. Sequel overperformed among Latinos, who helped to drive the B.O. success of the first “Alvin,” which cumed $217.3 million domestically and $143.3 million overseas for a worldwide total of $360.6 million.

The weekdays between Christmas and New Year’s weekend see Saturday-like business, and with such a strong Christmas weekend, distribs are hoping that the trend is even more pronounced this year.

“Avatar,” for instance, could hit $300 million in domestic B.O. by the end of New Year’s weekend.

Universal prexy of domestic distribution Nikki Rocco said “It’s Complicated” is poised to have lasting playability as older women become freed up from holiday activities. The romantic comedy received an A- CinemaScore, with moviegoers overwhelmingly female and over 30.

Relativity Media co-financed “It’s Complicated.”

Among limited releases, Terry Gilliam’s “The Imaginarium of Dr. Parnassus,” Heath Ledger’s final film, scored the top per-location average of the frame at $32,495. The Sony Pictures Classics release opened to an estimated $129,980 from four locations in New York and Los Angeles.

Fox Searchlight’s Jeff Bridges topliner “Crazy Heart” grossed an estimated $156,000 from 12 theaters in its second frame for a location average of $13,000 and cume of $320,578.

Peter Jackson’s “The Lovely Bones” grossed an estimated $38,000 from three runs in its third frame for a location average of $12,667 and cume of $273,000.

Tom Ford’s “A Single Man,” from the Weinstein Co., grossed an estimated $323,000 from 46 theaters in its third sesh for a location average of $7,022 and cume of $891,000.

SPC’s Pedro Almodovar pic “Broken Embraces” grossed an estimated $360,385 from 71 runs for a theater average of $5,076 and cume of $1.3 million in its sixth weekend.

Apparition’s Emily Blunt pic “The Young Victoria” grossed an estimated $603,866 from 163 runs for an average of $3,705 and cume of $886,514.

Prestige pics vying for awards attention at the end of the year face a tough road as they have to compete with bigger releases. The challenge is to hold on and play into January and February.

Distribs decided to take a different approach with “Up in the Air” and “Nine,” expanding nationwide over Christmas.

“Up in the Air” continued to play most strongly on the East and West coasts. Its per-screen average was $6,023; last Christmas, “Slumdog Millionaire,” playing on far fewer screens, grossed $4.3 million from 614 locations on the same weekend for a location average of $7,006.

“Nine,” with an ensemble cast that includes Daniel Day-Lewis and Marion Cotillard, had a tougher time and saw declines in holdover theaters in New York. However, musicals can have strong legs.

Calix Lewis Reneau
11466 posts
Joined Aug 21, 2007
 
 
     

Re: Sherlock Holmes > Avatar

by Tom Swift on Tue Dec 29, 2009 5:52am

Dances with Smurfs

Did you make that up?  That’s extremely funny. LOL

Avatar
Tom Swift
2839 posts
Joined Mar 24, 2008
 
 
     

Re: Sherlock Holmes > Avatar

by Calix Lewis Reneau on Tue Dec 29, 2009 8:08am

Tom Swift wrote:

Did you make that up?

Unfortunately, no…

Cheerfully,
Calix

(...but I did make up the other one…)

Calix Lewis Reneau
11466 posts
Joined Aug 21, 2007
 
 
     

Re: Sherlock Holmes > Avatar

by James Grimes on Tue Jan 05, 2010 9:56am

Sherlock Holmes was flat-out incredible.  Not only did it stay true to the characters and tropes of the source material (seriously, it did!), it provided a great crowd-pleasing story.  It’s too bad it was released alongside the world’s latest ‘filmmaking revolution’ or else it would have done much better in the box office.  I felt like i was watching Raiders of the Lost Ark or The Living Daylights.  An amazing adventure film, definitely greater than ‘Avatar’ overall.  I saw ‘Avatar’ in IMAX 3D, and this film still beat it.

Avatar
James Grimes
93 posts
Joined Feb 15, 2009
 
 
     

Re: Sherlock Holmes > Avatar

by Michael Traven on Tue Jan 05, 2010 10:31am

Jaaaaaaaaaames!  smile

Couldn’t agree more.  The ironic thing is that I’m not usually a fan of Indiana Jones type films.  But Sherlock Holmes was the perfect blend of wit and action.

Guy Ritchie is now my favorite director (more for the other three of his six movies I’ve seen than for Holmes, but yeh).

You gonna stay a while?  wink

Avatar
Michael Traven
3480 posts
Joined Oct 05, 2007
 
 
     

Re: Sherlock Holmes > Avatar

by Tabitha Groleau on Tue Jan 05, 2010 7:51pm

This makes me want to see Sherlock Holmes!  Even though I am required to go see Avatar.  raspberry .  If I had my own choice, I’d see Sherlock Holmes wink .

Avatar
Tabitha Groleau
1342 posts
Joined Aug 28, 2007
 
 
     

Re: Sherlock Holmes > Avatar

by James Grimes on Tue Jan 05, 2010 11:44pm

Eric Boellner wrote:

You gonna stay a while?  wink

Eh, maybe.  Flesh-and-blood life gets in the way.

Avatar
James Grimes
93 posts
Joined Feb 15, 2009
 
 
     

Re: Sherlock Holmes > Avatar

by Michael Traven on Wed Jan 06, 2010 12:08am

Tabitha, as Avatar is the big hype-fest that it is, I’d suggest going to see that instead of Holmes, if it comes down to one or the other.  While Holmes is a superior film, IMHO, you’ll need the experience of “Avatar in 3D, dude!”  rolleyes  Otherwise, imagine how many people in the film world will give you the :shock: look when you tell them you didn’t see Avatar in 3D.

wink

Yes, I am guilty of selling out… But I feel that if the entire culture of America is going to have the experience of this film, then it would be a benefit for me to share that experience, in order to understand my audience better…  Avatar is a pretty good film, anyways… just nothing near as good as it’s cracked up to be, IMHO!

Avatar
Michael Traven
3480 posts
Joined Oct 05, 2007
 
 
     

Re: Sherlock Holmes > Avatar

by Caleb Diaddigo on Wed Jan 06, 2010 5:18pm

James Grimes wrote:

An amazing adventure film, definitely greater than ‘Avatar’ overall.  I saw ‘Avatar’ in IMAX 3D, and this film still beat it.

While Sherlock Holmes was an incredible and cool film, I do not see it beating Avatar.

Avatar
Caleb Diaddigo
342 posts
Joined Feb 05, 2008
 
 
     

Re: Sherlock Holmes > Avatar

by Alex Beard on Thu Jan 07, 2010 8:22am

Calix Lewis Reneau wrote:

I’d take either set of numbers on Greyscale or SMT…

You’d settle for that??? :o wink

Avatar
Alex Beard
5280 posts
Joined Sep 28, 2008